USPTO Patents Application 09701705

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS

This listing of claims replaces all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the application:
Listing of Claims:

Claim 1 . (Previously Presented) A channel estimation device comprising:
weighting factor generating means for generating weighting factors for weighting and

averaging pilot symbols, which are time multiplexed at positions leaning in time to one side in

respective slots of a control channel, which is parallel multiplexed with a data channel; and

channel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot

symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols

of said data channel,

wherein said weighting factors are determined according to said leaning positions of said
pilot symbols in slots of said control channel.

Claim 2. (Original) The channel estimation device as claimed in claim 1,
wherein said weighting factor generating means generates weighting factors to be used for
weighting and averaging mean values of the pilot symbols in a plurality of slots of said control
channel, and said channel estimation value calculating means weights and averages the mean
values of said pilot symbols using said weighting factors and calculates the channel estimation
value of the data symbols of said data channel.

Claim 3. (Cancelled).

Page 2 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 4. (Previously Presented) A channel estimation device comprising:
weighting factor generating means for generating weighting factors for weighting and

averaging pilot symbols, which are time multiplexed with a control chaimel, which is parallel

multiplexed with a data channel; and

charmel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot

symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols

of said data channel,

wherein said weighting factor generating means divides data symbols in a slot of said
data chaimel into a plurality of data symbol sections, selects pilot symbols appropriate for
calculating the channel estimation value of the data s3anbols in each of the data symbol sections,
and generates the weighting factors which are used for weighting and averaging the pilot
symbols and which vary from data symbol section to data symbol section in a slot; and said
channel estimation value calculating means takes weighted average of said pilot symbols using
said weighting factors and calculates the channel estimation value of the data symbols of each of
the data symbol sections.

Pages of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 5. (Previously Presented) A channel estimation device comprising:
weighting factor generating means for generating weighting factors for weighting and

averaging pilot symbols, which are time multiplexed with a control channel, which is parallel

multiplexed with a data channel; and

charmel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot

symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a chaimel estimation value of data symbols

of said data channel,

wherein said weighting factor generating means divides the data symbols in the slots of
said data channel into a plurality of data symbol sections, selects the pilot symbols appropriate
for calculating the channel estimation value of the data symbols in each of the data symbol
sections, and generates the weighting factors to be used for weighting and averaging the pilot
symbols; and said channel estimation value calculating means takes weighted average of said
pilot symbols using said weighting factors and calculates the channel estimation value of the data
symbols of each of the data symbol sections,

wherein in order to calculate the charmel estimation value of the data symbols of the last
data symbol section of the i-th (i: integer) slot and to calculate the channel estimation value of
the data symbols of the first data symbol section of the (i+l)-th slot, said weighting factor
generating means selects the same pilot symbol and generates the weighting factors to be used
for weighting and averaging the pilot symbols.

Page 4 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 6. (Previously Presented) A channel estimation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for generating weighting factors for weighting and
averaging pilot symbols, which are time multiplexed with a control channel, which is parallel
multiplexed with a data channel; and

charmel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols
of said data channel,

wherein the charmel estimation device further comprises:

fading frequency decision means for deciding the fading frequency based on an

irmer product value of said pilot symbols; and

factor altering means for altering the factors that are used in taking said weighted

average according to the fading frequency decided by said fading frequency decision

means.

Claim 7. (Cancelled).

Page 5 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 8. (Previously Presented) A demodulation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for generating weighting factors used for weighting
and averaging pilot symbols being time multiplexed at positions leaning in time to one side in
respective slots of a control channel that was parallel multiplexed together with a data channel;

channel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and for calculating a channel estimation value of data
symbols of said data channel; and

chaimel variation compensating means for compensating channel variation of said data
symbols using the charmel estimation value calculated by said channel estimation value
calculating means,

wherein said weighting factors are determined according to said leaning positions of said
pilot symbols in slots of said control channel.

Claims 9-18. (Cancelled).

Page 6 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 19. (Previously Presented) A channel estimation device for calculating
a channel estimation value of data symbols using pilot symbols in a channel in which said data
symbols and said pilot symbols are time multiplexed, said channel estimation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols in a slot of said channel into
a plurality of data symbol sections, selecting pilot symbols suitable for calculation of a channel
estimation value of data symbols during each data symbol section and generating weighting
factors for weighting and averaging said pilot symbols; and

chaimel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols
during each data symbol section,

wherein in order to calculate the channel estimation value of the data symbols in the last
data symbol section in the i-th (i: integer) slot and to calculate the channel estimation value of
the data symbols of the first data symbol section in the (i+l)-th slot, said weighting factor
generating means selects the same pilot symbol and generates the weighting factors to be used
for weighting and averaging said pilot symbols.

Page 7 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 20. (Currently Amended) A channel estimation device for calculating a
channel estimation value of data symbols using pilot symbols in a channel in which said data
symbols and said pilot symbols are time multiplexed, said charmel estimation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols in a slot of said channel into
a plurality of data symbol sections each of which includes a plurality of data symbols, selecting
pilot symbols suitable for calculation of a channel estimation value of data symbols during each
data symbol section and generating weighting factors which are to be used for weighting and
averaging the pilot symbols and which vary from data symbol section to data symbol section in a
slot: and

channel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols
during each data symbol section; The channel estimation device as claimed in claim 1 8,

wherein said weighting factor generating means generates the weighting factors to be
used for weighting and averaging mean values of the pilot symbols for each of the plurality of
slots of said channel, and said channel estimation value calculating means takes weighted
average of the mean values of said pilot symbols using said weighting factors and calculates the
chaimel estimation value of the data symbols in each of the data symbol sections.

Claim 21. (Cancelled).

Page 8 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 22. (Currently Amended) A channel estimation device for calculating a
channel estimation value of data symbols using pilot symbols in a channel in which said data
symbols and said pilot symbols are time multiplexed, said channel estimation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols in a slot of said charmel into
a plurality of data symbol sections each of which includes a plurality of data symbols, selecting
pilot symbols suitable for calculation of a channel estimation value of data symbols during each
data symbol section and generating weighting factors which are to be used for weighting and
averaging the pilot symbols and which vary from data symbol section to data symbol section in a
slot; and

channel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols
during each data symbol section; The channel estimation device as claimed in claim 18, further
comprising:

fading frequency decision means for deciding the fading frequency based on the inner
product value of said pilot symbols; and

factor altering means for altering the factors to be used for taking said weighted
averaging according to the fading frequency decided by said fading frequency decision means.

Page 9 of 5 3

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 23. (Previously Presented) A demodulation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols in a slot of a channel into
which the data symbols and pilot symbols are time multiplexed into a plurality of data symbol
sections, selecting pilot symbols appropriate for calculating a channel estimation value of the
data symbols in each of the data symbol sections, and generating weighting factors which are to
be used for weighting and averaging said pilot symbols and which vary from data symbol section
to data symbol section in a slot;

chatmel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating the chaimel estimation value of the data
symbols in each of data symbol sections; and

channel variation compensating means for compensating chaimel variation of said data
symbols using the channel estimation value calculated by said charmel estimation value
calculating means.

Claims 24 -33. (Cancelled).

Page 10 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 34. (Currently Amended) A channel estimation device that calculates a
channel estimation value of data symbols of a data channel using pilot symbols of a pilot channel
which is parallel multiplexed v^ith said data channel, said chatmel estimation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols in said channel into a
plurality of data symbol sections each of which includes a plurality of data symbols, selecting for
each data symbol section, pilot symbols suitable for calculation of a charmel estimation value,
and generating for each data symbol section, weighting factors for weighting and averaging said
pilot symbols; and

charmel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols
during each data symbol section;

The channel estimation device as claimed in claim 33, wherein said weighting factor
generating means generates the weighting factors to be used for weighting and averaging mean
values of the pilot symbols in each of a plurality of sections in said pilot chaimel, and said
charmel estimation value calculating means takes weighted average of the mean values of said
pilot symbols using said weighting factors and calculates the charmel estimation value of the data
symbols in each of the data symbol sections.

Page 11 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 35. (Previously Presented) A channel estimation device that calculates a
channel estimation value of data symbols of a data channel using pilot symbols of a pilot channel
which is parallel multiplexed with said data channel, said channel estimation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols in said channel into a
plurality of data symbol sections, selecting pilot symbols suitable for calculation of a chaimel
estimation value of data symbols during each data symbol section and generating weighting
factors for weighting and averaging said pilot symbols; and

channel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols
during each data symbol section,

wherein the channel estimation device further comprises:

fading frequency decision means for deciding the fading frequency based on the inner
product value of said pilot symbols; and

factor altering means for altering the factors to be used for taking said weighted average
according to the fading frequency decided by said fading frequency decision means.

Claim 36. (Cancelled)

Page 12 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 37. (Previously Presented) A demodulation device comprising:
weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols of a data chaimel into a
plurality of data symbol sections each of which includes a plurality of data symbols, selecting for
each data symbol section, pilot symbols of a pilot channel that was parallel multiplexed together
with said data charmel, appropriate for calculating a channel estimation value, and generating for
each data symbol section, weighting factors to be used for weighting and averaging the pilot
symbols;

channel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating the channel estimation value of the data
symbols of each of the data symbol sections; and

charmel variation compensating means for compensating the charmel variation of said
data symbols using the channel estimation value calculated by said channel estimation value
calculating means.

Claims 38 - 46. (Cancelled).

Page 13 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 47. (Previously Presented) A method for estimating a channel,
comprising the steps of:

generating weighting factors to be used for weighting and averaging pilot symbols being
time multiplexed at positions leaning in time to one side in respective slots of a control channel
that was parallel multiplexed together with a data channel; and

averaging said pilot symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel
estimation value of data symbols of said data channel,

wherein said weighting factors are determined according to said leaning positions of said
pilot symbols in slots of said control channel.

Claim 48 -53. (Cancelled).

Page 14 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 54. (Original) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signal in time using
N in number of weighted sequences for data sequences of predetermined frame number;

compensating means for compensating data sequence using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting N' (N': natural number, N' < N) in number of
weighting sequences from said N data sequence after RAKE combining and selecting one data
sequence having the highest reliability from N data sequences,

selection of said N' weighting sequences being performed per a predetermined period, for
remaining data sequences until performing said reliability judgment again said chaimel
estimation means deriving N' channel estimation value by weighted averaging in time using N'
weighting sequences, said compensating means compensating data sequences using N' chaimel
estimation values, said RAKE combining means RAKE combining respective of N' data
sequences after compensation, and said reliability judgment means selecting one data sequence
having the highest reliability from said N' data sequences.

Page 15 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 20 1 0
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 55. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in claim §3-eF
54, wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of said data sequence
comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check) bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits
added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding result of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error counting means for counting said number of the frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said counting result of the frame errors.

Claim 56. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 53 or
54, wherein said reliability judging means forjudging reliability of the data sequence comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

likelihood information extracting means for extracting likelihood information that
is calculated when performing the error-correction decoding of each of the data
sequences;

likelihood averaging means for averaging said extracted likelihood information
for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said averaged likelihood information.

Page 16 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 57. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 53 or
54, wherein said reliability judging means forjudging reliability of the data sequence comprises:

electric power calculating means for calculating electric power of each of the data
sequences after said RAKE combination;

electric power averaging means for averaging said calculation result of the
electric power for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and data sequence that is demodulated using the weight sequence
so selected based on said averaged electric power.

Claim 58. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 53 or

54,

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of the data sequence
comprises:

signal-to-noise ratio(ratio of a signal power to a noise power) calculating means
for calculating a signal-to-noise ratio of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

signal-to-noise ratio averaging means for averaging the calculation result of said
signal-to-noise ratio for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said averaged signal-to-noise ratio.

Page 17 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 59. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in claim
54, wherein said reliability judging means forjudging reliability of the data sequence comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding result of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error counting means for counting the number of said frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time;

likelihood information extracting means for extracting likelihood information that
is calculated when performing error-correction decoding of each of the data sequences;

likelihood averaging means for averaging said extracted likelihood information
for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said coimted number of frame errors of the plurality of
data sequences and said averaged likelihood information.

Page 18 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 60. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 53 or
54, wherein said reliability judging means forjudging reliability of the data sequence comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding result of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error counting means for counting said number of the frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time;

electric power calculating means for calculating electric power of each of the data
sequences after said RAKE combination;

electric power averaging means for averaging said calculation result of the
electric power for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said number of frame errors and said averaged electric
power.

Page 19 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 61. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 53 or
54, wherein said reliability judging means forjudging reliability of the data sequence comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding result of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error coimting means for counting said number of the frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time;

signal-to-noise ratio calculating means for calculating a signal-to-noise ratio (ratio
of a signal power to a noise power) of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

signal-to-noise ratio averaging means for averaging the calculation result of said
signal-to-noise ratio for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting weight sequence having
high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight sequence so
selected based on said number of frame errors and said averaged signal-to-noise ratio.

Page 20 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 62. (Previously Presented) A demodulation device receiving a pilot
signal and a data sequence that are multiplexed in a channel and demodulating the data sequence
using the pilot signal, the demodulation device comprising:

charmel estimating means for weighted averaging of the pilot signal using a plurality of
predetermined weighting sequences and for deriving a pliirality of channel estimation values;

demodulating means to which the data sequence is input, the demodulating means
performing phase correction by applying the plurality of channel estimation values to the data
sequence, thereby generating and outputting a plurality of demodulated data sequences; and

reliability judging means for calculating a reliability for each of said plurality of
demodulated data sequences and for selecting one of the plurality of demodulated data sequences
based on the reliabilities of said plurality of demodulated data sequences, the reliability judging
means outputting the selected one of the plurality of demodulated data sequences.

Claim 63. (Original) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 62, wherein
said reliability judging means comprises selecting means for selecting predetermined

number of the weight sequences from among said plurality of weight sequences based on a

judgment result of reliability of said plurality of demodulated data sequences, and

said demodulating means performs the demodulation using only said predetermined

number of the weight sequences, when said predetermined number of the weight sequences were

selected.

Claim 64. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in any one of
claims [[53,]] 54 or 62, wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed in a control channel that
was parallel multiplexed together with a data channel in which said data sequence is contained.

Claim 65. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in any one of
claims [[53,]] 54 or 62, wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed in one channel together
with said data sequence.

Page 21 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 66. (Original) The demodulation device as described in claim 65, wherein
said chaimel estimating means divides the data sequence in the slots of said channel into a
plurality of data sequence sections, selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the channel
estimation value of the data in each of the data sequence sections, and calculates the channel
estimation value of the data of each of the data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the
selected pilot signals.

Claim 67. (Currently Amended) The demodulation device as claimed in any one of
claims [[53,]] 54 or 62, wherein said pilot signals are contained in a pilot channel that was
parallel multiplexed together with the data channel containing said data sequence.

Claim 68. (Original) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 67, wherein
said channel estimating means divides said data sequence into a plurality of data sequence
sections, selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the chaimel estimation value of the data
in each of the data sequence sections, and calculates the channel estimation value of the data in
each of the data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the selected pilot signals.

Claim 69. (Cancelled)

Page 22 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 70. (Original) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) pieces of channel
estimation values by time-weighting and averaging pilot signals using N sets of weight
sequences with respect to a previously-determined number of frames of data sequence;

the step of compensating the data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;

the step of RAKE combining each of N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting N' (N': natural number; N'<N) sets of the
weight sequences having high reliability from among said N sets of the data sequences after said
RAKE combination and selecting one set of data sequence having the highest reliability from
among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination,

wherein the selection of said N' sets of the weight sequences is conducted at regular
intervals, and throughout a period up to a time when said judgment of reliability is made next
time, with respect to remaining part of the data sequence, in said step of estimating the chaimel,
N' pieces of the channel estimation values are obtained by time-weighting and averaging the data
sequence using the N' sets of the weight sequences; in said step of compensating, the data
sequence is compensated using the N' pieces of the charmel estimation values; in said step of the
RAKE combination, each of the N' sets of the data sequences after the compensation is RAKE
combined; and in said reliability judgment step, one set of the data sequence having the highest
reliability is selected from among the N' sets of the data sequences.

Page 23 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 71 . (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 69 or
70, wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

error-correction decoding the data sequence after said RAKE combination;
extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;
decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on said demodulation result of
the CRC;

counting the number of said frame errors in a previously-determined measuring time; and
selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is

demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said counting result of the frame

errors.

Claim 72. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 69 or
70, wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

error-correction decoding the data sequence after said RAKE combination;

extracting likelihood information calculated when performing error-correction decoding
of each of the data sequence;

averaging said extracted likelihood information for a previously-determined measuring
time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said averaged likelihood
information.

Claim 73. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 69 or
70, wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

calculating electric power of each of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;

averaging the calculation result of said electric power for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said averaged electric power.

Page 24 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 74. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 69 or
70, wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

calculating a signal-to-noise ratio of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

averaging the calculation result of said signal-to-noise ratios for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said averaged signal-to-noise ratio.

Claim 75. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 69 or
70, wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

performing error-correction decoding of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on said decoding result of the

CRC;

counting said number of the frame errors in a previously-determined measuring time;

extracting likelihood information that is calculated when performing error-correction d
decoding of each of the data sequences;

averaging said extracted likelihood information for a previously-determined measuring
time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said measured number of the frame
errors of the plurality of the data sequences and said averaged likelihood information.

Page 25 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 76. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in either of
claim 69 or 70, wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

error-correction decoding said data sequences after said RAKE combination;
extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;
decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on the decoding result of said

CRC;

counting the number of said frame errors in a previously-determined measuring time;
calculating electric power of each of received data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

averaging the calculation result of said electric power for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said number of frame errors and
said averaged electric power.

Claim 77. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method [[of]] as claimed in claim
69 or 70, wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

error-correction decoding said data sequences after said RAKE combination;
extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;
decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on the decoding result of said

CRC;

counting the number of said frame errors in a previously-determined measuring time;
calculating a signal-to-noise ratio of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

averaging calculation result of said signal-to-noise ratios for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having a high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated with the weight sequence so selected based on the number of said frame errors and
said averaged signal-to-noise ratio.

Page 26 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 78. (Previously Presented) A demodulation method used in a
demodulation device which receives a pilot signal and a data sequence that are multiplexed in a
charmel and demodulates the data sequence using the pilot signal, comprising the steps of:

weighting and averaging the pilot signal using a plurality of predetermined weight
sequences to obtain a plurality of channel estimation values;

deriving a plurality of demodulated data sequences from the data sequence by performing
phase correction in which said plurality of channel estimation values are applied to the data
sequence;

calculating a reliability for each of said plurality of demodulated data sequences;
selecting one of the plurality of demodulated data sequences based on the reliability of
each of said plurality of demodulated data sequences; and
outputting the selected demodulated data sequence.

Claim 79. (Original) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 78, wherein,
based on the judgment result of reliability of said plurality of demodulated data sequences, a
predetermined number of weight sequences are selected from among said plurality of weight
sequences, and after the selection, demodulation through the use of only the selected weight
sequences is performed.

Claim 80. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in any one of
claims 69^70 or 78, wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed into a control channel that is
parallel multiplexed together with a data chaimel in which said data sequence is contained.

Claim 81. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in any one of
claims 69^-70 or 78, wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed into one channel together
with said data sequence.

Page 27 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 82. (Original) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 81, wherein
said step of estimating a channel divides said data sequence in the slots of said channel into a
plurality of data sequence sections, selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the channel
estimation value of the data of each of the data sequence sections, and calculates a channel
estimation value of the data of each of the data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the
selected pilot signals.

Claim 83. (Currently Amended) The demodulation method as claimed in any one of
claims 69^-70 or 78, wherein said pilot signals are contained in a pilot chaimel that was parallel
multiplexed together with a data channel containing said data sequence.

Claim 84. (Original) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 83, wherein
said step of estimating a channel divides said data sequence into a plurality of data sequence
sections, selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the channel estimation value of the data
in each of the data sequence sections, and calculates the channel estimation value of the data of
each of the data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the selected pilot signals.

Page 28 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 85. (Previously Presented) A channel estimation device for calculating
a chaimel estimation value of data symbols using pilot symbols in a channel in which said data
symbols and said pilot symbols are time multiplexed, said chaimel estimation device comprising:

weighting factor generating means for dividing data symbols in a slot of said channel into
a plurality of data symbol sections, selecting pilot symbols suitable for calculation of a chaimel
estimation value of data symbols during each data symbol section and generating weighting
factors for weighting and averaging said pilot symbols; and

channel estimation value calculating means for weighting and averaging said pilot
symbols using said weighting factors and calculating a channel estimation value of data symbols
during each data symbol section,

wherein said pilot symbols are time multiplexed at positions leaning in time to one side in
respective slots of said channel, and

said weighting factors are determined according to said leaning positions of said pilot
symbols in slots of said channel.

Page 29 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 20 1 0

Claim 86. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective charmel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of said data sequence
comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check) bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits
added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding resuft of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error counting means for counting said number of the frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said counting result of the frame errors.

Page 30 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 87. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of the data sequence
comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

likelihood information extracting means for extracting likelihood information that
is calculated when performing the error-correction decoding of each of the data
sequences;

likelihood averaging means for averaging said extracted likelihood information
for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said averaged likelihood information.

Page 31 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 88. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of the data sequence
comprises:

electric power calculating means for calculating electric power of each of the data
sequences after said RAKE combination;

electric power averaging means for averaging said calculation result of the
electric power for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and data sequence that is demodulated using the weight sequence
so selected based on said averaged electric power.

Page 32 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 89. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of the data sequence
comprises:

signal-to-noise ratio(ratio of a signal power to a noise power) calculating means
for calculating a signal-to-noise ratio of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

signal-to-noise ratio averaging means for averaging the calculation resuh of said
signal-to-noise ratio for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said averaged signal-to-noise ratio.

Page 33 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 90. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of the data sequence
comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding result of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error counting means for counting the number of said frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time;

likelihood information extracting means for extracting likelihood information that
is calculated when performing error-correction decoding of each of the data sequences;

likelihood averaging means for averaging said extracted likelihood information
for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said counted number of frame errors of the plurality of
data sequences and said averaged likelihood information.

Page 34 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 91. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of the data sequence
comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding result of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error counting means for counting said number of the frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time;

electric power calculating means for calculating electric power of each of the data
sequences after said RAKE combination;

electric power averaging means for averaging said calculation result of the
electric power for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting the weight sequence
having high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight
sequence so selected based on said number of frame errors and said averaged electric
power.

Page 35 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 92. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said reliability judging means for judging reliability of the data sequence
comprises:

error-correction decoding means for performing error-correction decoding of the
data sequence after said RAKE combination;

CRC bit extracting means for extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

CRC decoding means for decoding the CRC for said data sequence;

frame error detecting means for detecting the presence or absence of a frame error
based on a decoding result of said CRC;

number-of-frame-error counting means for counting said number of the frame
errors in a previously-determined measuring time;

signal-to-noise ratio calculating means for calculating a signal-to-noise ratio (ratio
of a signal power to a noise power) of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

signal-to-noise ratio averaging means for averaging the calculation result of said
signal-to-noise ratio for a previously-determined measuring time; and

weight sequence and data selecting means for selecting weight sequence having
high reliability and the data sequence that is demodulated using the weight sequence so
selected based on said number of frame errors and said averaged signal-to-noise ratio.

Page 36 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 93. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed in a control charmel that was parallel
multiplexed together with a data channel in which said data sequence is contained.

Page 37 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 94. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective channel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed in one channel together with said data
sequence.

Claim 95. (New) The demodulation device as described in claim 94, wherein said
channel estimating means divides the data sequence in the slots of said channel into a plurality of
data sequence sections, selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the channel estimation
value of the data in each of the data sequence sections, and calculates the channel estimation
value of the data of each of the data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the selected
pilot signals.

Page 38 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 96. (New) A demodulation device comprising:

channel estimating means for deriving N (N is natural number greater than or equal to
two) in number of channel estimation values by weighted averaging of pilot signals in time using
N in number of weighted sequences;

compensating means for compensating data sequences using said respective charmel
estimation values;

RAKE combining means for RAKE combining respective of said N data sequences after
compensation; and

reliability judgment means for selecting one data sequence having highest reliability from
said N data sequences after RAKE combination;

wherein said pilot signals are contained in a pilot charmel that was parallel multiplexed
together with the data channel containing said data sequence.

Claim 97. (New) The demodulation device as claimed in claim 96, wherein said
channel estimating means divides said data sequence into a plurality of data sequence sections,
selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the channel estimation value of the data in each of
the data sequence sections, and calculates the channel estimation value of the data in each of the
data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the selected pilot signals.

Page 39 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 98. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;
wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:
error-correction decoding the data sequence after said RAKE combination;
extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;
decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on said demodulation result of
the CRC;

counting the number of said frame errors in a previously-determined measuring time; and
selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is

demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said counting result of the frame

errors.

Page 40 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 99. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;
wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

error-correction decoding the data sequence after said RAKE combination;

extracting likelihood information calculated when performing error-correction
decoding of each of the data sequence;

averaging said extracted likelihood information for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said averaged likelihood
information.

Page 41 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 100. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said charmel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;
wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

calculating electric power of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

averaging the calculation result of said electric power for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said averaged electric
power.

Page 42 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 101. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;
wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

calculating a signal-to-noise ratio of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

averaging the calculation result of said signal-to-noise ratios for a previously-
determined measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said averaged signal-to-
noise ratio.

Page 43 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 102. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;
wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

performing error-correction decoding of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on said decoding result
of the CRC;

counting said number of the frame errors in a previously-determined measuring

time;

extracting likelihood information that is calculated when performing error-
correction d decoding of each of the data sequences;

averaging said extracted likelihood information for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said measured number of
the frame errors of the plurality of the data sequences and said averaged likelihood
information.

Page 44 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 103. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;
wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

error-correction decoding said data sequences after said RAKE combination;

extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on the decoding result of
said CRC;

counting the number of said frame errors in a previously-determined measuring

time;

calculating electric power of each of received data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

averaging the calculation result of said electric power for a previously-determined
measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having high reliability and the data sequence that is
demodulated using the weight sequence so selected based on said number of frame errors
and said averaged electric power.

Page 45 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 104. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;
wherein said reliability judgment step comprises the steps of:

error-correction decoding said data sequences after said RAKE combination;

extracting CRC bits added to said data sequence;

decoding the CRC with respect to said data sequence;

detecting the presence or absence of a frame error based on the decoding result of
said CRC;

counting the number of said frame errors in a previously-determined measuring

time;

calculating a signal-to-noise ratio of each of the data sequences after said RAKE
combination;

averaging calculation result of said signal-to-noise ratios for a previously-
determined measuring time; and

selecting the weight sequence having a high reliability and the data sequence that
is demodulated with the weight sequence so selected based on the number of said frame
errors and said averaged signal-to-noise ratio.

Page 46 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 105. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;

wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed into a control channel that is parallel
multiplexed together with a data charmel in which said data sequence is contained.

Page 47 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 106. (Currently Amended) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and

averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight

sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;

wherein said pilot signals are time multiplexed into one channel together with said data
sequence.

Claim 107. (New) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 106, wherein said
step of estimating a channel divides said data sequence in the slots of said channel into a
plurality of data sequence sections, selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the channel
estimation value of the data of each of the data sequence sections, and calculates a channel
estimation value of the data of each of the data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the
selected pilot signals.

Page 48 of 53

Application No. 09/701,705
Amendment "L" dated September 9, 2010
Reply to Final Office Action mailed June 9, 2010

Claim 108. (New) A demodulation method comprising:

the step of obtaining N pieces of channel estimation values by time-weighting and
averaging pilot signals using N (N: natural number greater than or equal to 2) sets of weight
sequences;

the step of compensating data sequence using each of said channel estimation values;
the step of RAKE combining each of the N sets of the data sequences after said
compensation; and

the reliability judgment step of selecting one set of the data sequences having the highest
reliability from among the N sets of the data sequences after said RAKE combination;

wherein said pilot signals are contained in a pilot channel that was parallel multiplexed
together with a data channel containing said data sequence.

Claim 109. (New) The demodulation method as claimed in claim 108, wherein said
step of estimating a channel divides said data sequence into a plurality of data sequence sections,
selects pilot signals appropriate for calculating the channel estimation value of the data in each of
the data sequence sections, and calculates the channel estimation value of the data of each of the
data sequence sections by weighting and averaging the selected pilot signals.

Page 49 of 5 3